Welcome

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam pulvinar orci id neque tristique euismod. Integer tincidunt varius orci, pretium consequat dui suscipit eu. Vestibulum vehicula, ligula eu tincidunt facilisis, enim metus accumsan massa, sed tempus sapien ante eu magna. Suspendisse id nunc non nunc sagittis feugiat. 

Read more

Recent Posts

Post another title here

by Jake Wilson

Post another title here

by Joe Cool

Post another title here

by Jake Wilson

Recent Forum Topics

This front page section will display the latest half dozen forum posts to encourage click-through to the Community Forum.

Latest Video / Whitepaper, etc.

This front page section could display a video tutorial or an interview with a project leader. Visitors are encouraged to visit the Resources section for more learning materials and reference links.

Recent Polls

This section would display a current poll and a list of past polls.

« CJEU Ruling - UK Procurement Rules on Challenging Decisions are Illegal | Main | Office of Government Commerce (OGC) Claims £196.7m in ICT savings »
Thursday
Jan282010

Court rules in BSkyB v EDS

The High Court has ruled in the BSkyB v EDS case that EDS’ behaviour in offering Sky implementation timescales without reasonable basis for doing so involved a fraudulent misrepresentation and that EDS was also liable for negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract.

EDS had been contracted to build a £48 million customer relationship management system which Sky ended up having to build itself at a cost of £265 million.

It is debateable whether the finding will trigger an overhaul of existing sales processes – as some had anticipated – given the Court’s focus upon the conduct of one of EDS’ employees who had “demonstrated an outstanding ability to be dishonest” rather than upon any systemic failure on EDS’ part. However, the judgment, which stretches to 500 pages, stands as a caution to those involved in procurement.

Click here to read the judgment.

Click here to read a summary of the ruling.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.